- Problem Overview –
There is
always a consequence for everyone's actions and daily activities in ones daily
life is something people don't think about what they cause. This problem is
carbon footprint, or the amount of carbon dioxide that gets released into the
environment due to these day to day routines. Since everyone has a carbon
footprint, it has come to the attention of many that such activities people do
are harming the earth we live in, more importantly causing the greenhouse
effect to get even stronger. Since this is such a big spectrum of people in the
world, focusing on opposite sides of the country is something more feasible.
Drexel University is located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania which is one of the
biggest cities in the county that has a highly dense population of about 1.5
million people. Looking over at the opposite side of the country, there is UC
Berkeley in Berkeley, California where the population is more spread out,
totaling at about 100 thousand. Comparing these two different worlds is a
way to see the main factors that cause the most greenhouse gas production among
students. Activities included can be anything from traveling, to how much time
is spent in a building, to other forms of energy sources used and other smaller
things a student may do during a day. This research will allow us to help these
students and universities to reduce their carbon footprint and therefore slow
the rate of global climate change. Going even closer, the research will target
the freshman of both schools; the reason for this is it is a transition from
high school to close to real world experiences that individuals will have a
routine that follows most of their life. It is a median between those two and
by focusing on freshman; it will gain a better focus on to what might be a
leading factor to carbon footprint release among individuals.
- Design Constraints –
Since doing this research,
there are some design constraints. First of all, Drexel University has more
than 3,070 freshmen in 2011 [4], and Berkeley has 5,600 freshmen [5]. Due to
the fact that the huge population of freshmen in those two universities, it is
really hard to calculate the carbon emissions that all of the students produce
per week accurately. What can we do just take the average number of those data.
Besides, different people have different lifestyles. It might be huge
difference between two students that live in the same place. Secondly,
Berkeley’s climate and people’s lifestyle may different between people in
Philadelphia, thus, we just can doing research through internet and asking the
freshmen in Berkeley about their lifestyle, because it is really hard to
measure the exactly data of Berkeley . Another problem that arises with this project
is that certain activities may be difficult to measure between person to
person, which means that there may be varying data or data that cannot be
obtained readily.
- Pre-Existing
Solutions –
There are many different
theories currently in place to help lower people’s carbon footprint. They range
from harnessing alternative energy sources to feeding cows more garlic [6].
Almost every time you hear something about becoming more environmentally
friendly, it is to help lower your carbon footprint.
The most noticeable
solutions are being taken large companies. Solar panels, hydroelectric dams,
wind turbines, nuclear power plants, and more efficient ways of harnessing
fossil fuels are all being used by power companies and major corporations to
reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) gasses. Specifically,
the Exelon Corporation, a power provider, has reduced its emissions in its
Exelon 2020 strategy by harnessing all these different types of alternative
energy [7].
There are also many
websites online to inform people of what a carbon footprint is, what a carbon
footprint does, and how to calculate their own carbon footprint. Carbon Trust
is an organization devoted “…to accelerate the move to a low carbon economy”
[8].
Additionally, there are
many things that are being done on a personal level that can really make a difference.
Switching from an incandescent bulb to a fluorescent bulb reduces CO2 [9].
Feeding cows more garlic was proven to reduce bovine emissions of methane (CH4).
[8] Buying a more fuel efficient car reduces CO2. Even
becoming a vegan is proven to reduce CO2 [10]. There are many
pre-existing solutions, it’s whether people use them or not.
- Design Goal –
We aim to create an
estimate carbon footprint of an average Drexel and UC Berkeley student so that
we can determine the activities that are the largest contributors to global
warming in these students’ weekly schedules. We will then use this information
in order to suggest ways that both individual students and universities may
decrease their impact on global climate change. Our approach differs from other
groups who determine carbon footprints because we will be determining the
environmental impact of students at these schools both in their leisure time
and while they are in class instead of focusing on a household or a company,
which would only track a person’s impact during part of their day. Our approach
also takes into account the location of the students and how that affects their
greenhouse gas contribution by comparing students at two different universities
in different parts of the country.
- Project Deliverables –
The physical deliverables
of this project are a blog post each week which describes where we are in our
research and a report at the end of the term detailing the findings of our
research.
- Project Schedule –
Week 1
|
Week 2
|
Week 3
|
Week 4
|
Week 5
|
Week 6
|
Week 7
|
Define Student
activities and track how often they occur among Drexel and UC Berkeley
students
|
Compare findings and
come to conclusions
|
|||||
Determine greenhouse
quantities produced by each activity
|
Determine large-
and small-scale actions that can decrease the carbon footprint of these
students and universities
|
- Projected Budget –
There are no projected
costs associated with this project, although further research done may
encounter some financial costs for the group.
In the "design goal" section "an accurate" should be changed to "an estimate".
ReplyDelete